Crazy dangerous takeoff 767 in severe storm!!

I'm Rick James, ...
I'm Rick James, BITCH!
enigma800


Some of you people ...
Some of you people really need to lighten up. Your skin is so thin that one little jab at your country or airplanes or whatever and you all loose your collective minds. I have way to much fun watching my phone blow up after posting some little diatribe that says Russian plane are crappy, or Russian pilots suck, that I just sit there and laugh. Some of you people take yourself way to freaking seriously. Lighten up, take a shot of Vodka and say something funny. he he
danahan01


I remember taking ...
I remember taking off in a thunderstorm from Houston Texas. I was surprised that the plane I was on still took off.
watertakken


You math geniuses ...
You math geniuses could have just counted the runway lights. They are 200 ft. apart.
Tailtube


@istvanklein ...
@istvanklein Nonsense
buishuiler


hey that's stolen ...
hey that's stolen from me bitch
frizstyler


@ChinmayJ15 text ...
@ChinmayJ15 text whas too long for end calculation :-) but anyhow: So L(lenght)=72.5Nm/3600s * 1.852Km * 52s = 1.94Km, roughly 2000m lenght traveled on the runway.
buishuiler


@ChinmayJ15 we have ...
@ChinmayJ15 we have to assume some values to calculate the distance traveled over the runway. Headwind is about 25 Kts, VR some 15 Kts TAS above normal VR = 155 +15=170 KTS. GS at VR is 170-25=145 KTS. However accelleration graphic is analog to an e-curve, minding the headwind of 25 KTS, the acceleration is more or less lineair. So the track traveled wheels on runway: Time V0 to VR is 0:04/0:56=52s. Vaverage on track is 145KTS GS at VR/2= 72,5 Nm/hr. So L(lenght)=72.5Nm/3600s * 1.852Km * 52s =
buishuiler


I wouldn't say that ...
I wouldn't say that. I have flown on Russian aircraft quite a few times, they are very sturdy and resilient. Many years ago a Hungarian Airlines Tu-154 landed on its belly in Greece because the pilots had forgotten to lower the landing gear and, after sliding some 500 metres, it was able to get airborne again, go around and land safely. The pilots were sacked but everyone on board lived to tell the tale.
istvanklein


@ChinmayJ15 there ...
@ChinmayJ15 there is a crosswind component from port side and the actual wheater condition in my days we called "soup". When taking off in the soup, you better take care for some extra speed, so starting to rotate atleast at V2 instead at VR, the increased speed is your energy reserve to eliminate downdrafts and gusts. This is the reason the pilot is rotating fairly late at somewhere 3/4 lenght of the runway.
buishuiler


ça prend énormément ...
ça prend énormément de temps à s'envoler.  Évidemment ça se passe en russie, faut s'attendre à toutes sortes de conneries dans ce pays-là
thibeaultpierre


The spoilers are up ...
The spoilers are up to help with the yaw created by the aileron input required in what looks like a crosswind condition. The inboard control surfaces going up and down are being used in what looks like a gust rejection scheme. (Notice minimal aeroelastic effects on the wing) Great design by Boeing!  Also full flaps long roll because of again the cross wind instead of a head wind.
dragonoftheninja


Anybody else ...
Anybody else thinking that the takeoff roll was a bit too long? I wonder how much runway he had left?
ChinmayJ15


whoa, that looks ...
whoa, that looks like a bumpy ride! i guess boeing 767's are pretty good planes flying in that awful weather.
theseakite2


The spoilers were ...
The spoilers were probably deployed because the wind would otherwise cause a too early take off most likely resulting in a crash.
LePawlow


that was cool ...
that was cool takeoff
09soilder


vollidiot! oh: I am ...
vollidiot! oh: I am sorry. I translate: ignorant idiot with an IQ barely sufficient to breath. Try to translate this to german
73erKadett


and whats the ...
and whats the danger with that here? as speed increases, woulnt you just retract them?
richygambs321


Very dangerous. ...
Very dangerous. Only an American built Boeing aircraft could even think of this type of flying. A Russian airplane would have turned the passengers into little pieces of flesh hanging from trees in a village along the flight path.
danahan01


wow! i like this.. ...
wow! i like this.. it is normal to 'give-in' some angle to the control into the wind during crosswind takeoff.. n the pilot did very well!!!
radial161


and a massive ...
and a massive cross-wind is of no concern?
notsureyou


please read the ...
please read the many, many, many comments that deal with what you wrote :)
notsureyou


why the hell are ...
why the hell are the spoilors coming up? all they do is stop lift, unless he was wanting to building up more speed on the ground before going up.
fastcircuit


Didn't look to be ...
Didn't look to be all that dangerous a takeoff. You lived to tell the tale, didn't you? Planes can fly through rain, not a problem. It's ice and snow that makes for risky takeoffs because it messes up the critical wing shape.
DDunker51