
Will they never cease? NOTE: To read comments properly, click "read all (X) comments" (However, note that the comments may display in reverse-chronological order. But within a chain of replies, it will be chronological order. Weird, I know.) xkcd.com revisionism.nl And to people giving me comments purporting 9 conspiracy theories: en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org Some more stuff: wtc.nist.gov www.civil.northwestern.edu www.nytimes.com www.implosionworld.com news.bbc.co.uk blogs.zdnet.com www.usatoday.com Even more stuff (most of it about a certain Mr. Griffin): www.publiceye.org www.publiceye.org mckinneysucks.blogspot.com www.911myths.com www.popularmechanics.com enr.construction.com www.iscpubs.com www.democracynow.org AMY GOODMAN: Are you saying that planes did not -- you do not believe the evidence is there that planes brought down the world trade center, the planes that slammed into tower one and tower two? DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: I'm saying that people who have studied this have come up with very strong reasons to believe that neither the impact of the plane combined with the fires would be sufficient, and many fire men as I record in the book, have -- and engineers have come to that conclusion, too. Again, I'm calling for an investigation by people who do have the expertise, but the problem is that the Bush administration created a halo over 9/11, so it became not only unpatriotic, but almost sack religious to raise any questions. Therefore, the main line press has not <b>...</b>
conspiracy
theory
9/11
nonsense
logic
sonicsuns